Oppo Reno 16 Pro vs Oppo A7 Pro Max
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Reno 16 Pro Manufactured in May, 2026, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500s, vs Oppo A7 Pro Max, Manufactured in August, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 16 Pro
- Lighter design: 205g vs 224g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
Reasons to choose Oppo A7 Pro Max
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 7000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1272x2772 pixels | 1272x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | n/a |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 330 Hz | 330 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.6 % | 88.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - DC dimming |
DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.31 mm (6.35 in) | 162.98 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 76.46 mm (3.01 in) | 77.97 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) | 8.57 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- Black - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 3730 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU | Yes |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2623 | 976 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8359 | 2250 |
| CPU | 856895 | 341732 |
| GPU | 1052004 | 59033 |
| Memory | 449847 | 102238 |
| UX | 720552 | 149051 |
| NanoReview Score | 3079298 | 652054 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 16 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 7000 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 16320x12240 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 116 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | n/a |
| Focal length | 80 mm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Focal length | 16 mm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800MHz | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/4/5/8/19 | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2026 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2026 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 660 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 16 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0