Home Phone comparison Oppo Reno 8T and Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G - Which is better?

Oppo Reno 8T vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

51 out 100
Oppo Reno 8T
VS
67 out 100
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
Oppo Reno 8T
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Reno 8T Manufactured in February, 2023, with display 6.43 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G, Manufactured in December, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 8T
  • Higher pixel density: 409ppi
  • Lighter design: 183g vs 195g
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
  • Larger display: 6.77in
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB		 - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo Reno 8T and Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Oppo Reno 8T
vs
Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.43 in 6.77 in
Resolution 1080x2400 pixels 1080x2392 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 n/a
Pixel density 409 ppi 388 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness 800 nits n/a
HDR support No n/a
Touch Sampling Rate 180 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 84 % 89.1 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 160.8 mm (6.33 in) 163.2 mm (6.43 in)
Width 73.84 mm (2.91 in) 76.3 mm (3 in)
Thickness 7.85 mm (0.31 in) 8 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 183 g (6.46 oz) 195 g (6.88 oz)
Water resistance No IP65
Back panel Plastic Plastic
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - Black
- Orange		 - Black
- Gray
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Reno 8T
84 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
89.1 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Reno 8T and Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Helio G200 Ultra
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)		 - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Yes Yes
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G57 MP2
GPU Cores 128 64
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 140.8 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Reno 8T
728
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
734
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Reno 8T
1978
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
2008
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)728734
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)19782008
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo Reno 8T]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Reno 8T
395565
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
447931
CPU134452139717
GPU5227665836
Memory102260124991
UX106577117387
NanoReview Score395565447931
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Reno 8T
1366
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
n/a
Stability99 %n/a
Graphics Test8 fpsn/a
Graphics Score1366n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Oppo Reno 8T]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Oppo Reno 8T
9054
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
n/a
Writing score11837n/a
Web score9254n/a
Video editing5357n/a
Data manipulation7200n/a
NanoReview Score9054n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 128 GB
- 256 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory CardMicroSDMicroSD

Software

OS Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) Android 15
UI Skin ColorOS 13 HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 18 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes (54% in 30 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 1:15 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 100 MP 200 MP
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 120 fps (720p) n/a
Wide-angle lens n/a 120 °
Lenses count Standard: 100 MP
Macro: 2 MP
Depth: 2 MP		 Standard: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix100 MP200 MP
Aperturef/1.7f/2.2
Focal length26 mm25 mm
SensorSamsungn/a
Sensor sizen/a1/4 (0.25)
Pixel size0.64 μm0.7 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrixn/a8 MP
Aperturen/af/2.2
Focal lengthn/a15 mm
Sensor sizen/a1/4 (0.25)
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
Stabilizationn/aDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 32 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 22 mm n/a
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size n/a 1/3 (0.33)
Pixel size n/a 0.7 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Varies by region
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHzn/a
3G BandsWCDMA 1/5/8n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41)n/a
LTE category13n/a
5G SupportNoNo

Sound

Speakers Stereo n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced February, 2023 yr December, 2025 yr
Release Date February, 2023 yr December, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 350 n/a
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 33 W n/a
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below