Realme C53 vs Realme C100 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Realme C53 Manufactured in May, 2023, with display 6.74 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612, vs Realme C100 4G, Manufactured in April, 2026with chipsetMediaTek Helio G92 Max. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Realme C53
- Higher pixel density: 390ppi
- Lighter design: 182g vs 219g
Reasons to choose Realme C100 4G
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.74 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 720x1570 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 560 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5 % | 87.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 167.3 mm (6.59 in) | 166.48 mm (6.55 in) |
| Width | 76.7 mm (3.02 in) | 78.23 mm (3.08 in) |
| Thickness | 7.49 mm (0.29 in) | 8.63 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold |
- White - Purple - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 | MediaTek Helio G92 Max |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | MediaTek APU |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 32 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 78.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 422 | 430 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1511 | 1347 |
| CPU | 87315 | 92602 |
| GPU | 28466 | 83209 |
| Memory | 67524 | 64494 |
| UX | 69669 | 97748 |
| NanoReview Score | 252974 | 338053 |
| Writing score | 9931 | n/a |
| Web score | 7098 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4571 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5649 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 7942 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | Realme UI T | Realme UI 7.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (27% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:09 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/3/5/8 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B3/B5/B7/B8/B11/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2023 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 180 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 250 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Realme C100 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0