Realme Note 50 vs Infinix GT 10 Pro
42
out 100
VS
59
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Realme Note 50 Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 6.74 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612, vs Infinix GT 10 Pro, Manufactured in August, 2023 with chipsetМеdiаТеk Dimеnsity 8050. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Realme Note 50
- Larger display: 6.74in
- Lighter design: 186g vs 187g
Reasons to choose Infinix GT 10 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB |
8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.74 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 560 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6 % | 87 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 167.2 mm (6.58 in) | 162.66 mm (6.4 in) |
| Width | 76.7 mm (3.02 in) | 75.89 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP53 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- Black - Silver |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 | МеdiаТеk Dimеnsity 8050 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A78) - 1/3 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | MediaTek APU 570 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G77 MP9 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 576 |
| GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 78.6 GFLOPS | 979.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 422 | 1157 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1515 | 3201 |
| CPU | 89261 | 218020 |
| GPU | 22518 | 214423 |
| Memory | 63430 | 154677 |
| UX | 65020 | 185187 |
| NanoReview Score | 240229 | 772307 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| UI Skin | Realme UI T | XOS 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:01 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 07:38 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 12:37 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:17 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 122 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 240 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung HM6 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1440p at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM B2|3|5|8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | August, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2024 yr | August, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 110 | 240 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix GT 10 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
