Realme Note 60 vs Cubot Max 5
46
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Realme Note 60 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 6.74 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612, vs Cubot Max 5, Manufactured in July, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Realme Note 60
- Lighter design: 187g vs 223g
Reasons to choose Cubot Max 5
- Larger display: 6.95in
- Higher pixel density: 387ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5100mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.74 in | 6.95 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1080x2460 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 21:9 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | n/a |
| Max brightness | 560 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6 % | 82.2 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 167.26 mm (6.59 in) | 173.9 mm (6.85 in) |
| Width | 76.67 mm (3.02 in) | 78.9 mm (3.11 in) |
| Thickness | 7.84 mm (0.31 in) | 9.2 mm (0.36 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 223 g (7.87 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | No |
| Back panel | Metal | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- White - Black |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 3100 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2 (Cortex A55) - 3/3 (Cortex A78) - 1/3.1 (Cortex A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | MediaTek APU 580 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G610 MP6 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 78.6 GFLOPS | 1442 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 420 | 1241 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1535 | 3810 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 4716 |
| CPU | 90471 | 242170 |
| GPU | 23788 | 222177 |
| Memory | 70781 | 186614 |
| UX | 65109 | 197896 |
| NanoReview Score | 250149 | 848857 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 5.0 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 2:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 100 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 32 MP Depth |
Standard: 100 MP Macro: 5 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 32 MP | 100 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OVA0B40 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.61 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.3 |
| Sensor | CMOS | Sony IMX616 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | July, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | July, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 90 | 265 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Cubot Max 5 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
