Realme Note 60 vs OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : Realme Note 60 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 6.74 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612, vs OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite, Manufactured in July, 2024 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Realme Note 60
- Larger display: 6.74in
- Lighter design: 187g vs 191g
Reasons to choose OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 394ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5110mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.74 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 260 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 560 nits | 2100 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.6 % | 87.2 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 167.26 mm (6.59 in) | 162.9 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 76.67 mm (3.02 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.84 mm (0.31 in) | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP54 |
| Back panel | Metal | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- Silver - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 78.6 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 420 | 903 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1535 | 1985 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1454 |
| CPU | 90471 | 155713 |
| GPU | 23788 | 86446 |
| Memory | 70781 | 115682 |
| UX | 65109 | 124115 |
| NanoReview Score | 250149 | 481956 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 5.0 | OxygenOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5110 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (50% in 22 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:51 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 32 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 24 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 7 | 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | June, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | July, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 90 | 329 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0