Home Phone comparison Realme Note 60 and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro - Which is better?

Realme Note 60 vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

46 out 100
Realme Note 60
VS
83 out 100
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Realme Note 60
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Realme Note 60 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 6.74 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612, vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, Manufactured in July, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Realme Note 60
  • Lighter design: 187g vs 208g
Reasons to choose Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
  • Larger display: 6.8in
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/256 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Realme Note 60 and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Realme Note 60
vs
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD AMOLED
Size 6.74 in 6.8 in
Resolution 720x1600 pixels 1280x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 260 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness 560 nits 1600 nits
HDR support No No
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 240 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 85.6 % 90.3 %
Features n/a - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 167.26 mm (6.59 in) 162.8 mm (6.41 in)
Width 76.67 mm (3.02 in) 77.2 mm (3.04 in)
Thickness 7.84 mm (0.31 in) 8.3 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 208 g (7.34 oz)
Water resistance IP64 IPX9
Cooling system n/a Active fan
Back panel Metal n/a
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - Black
- Blue		 - Black
- Silver
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Realme Note 60
85.6 %
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
90.3 %

Performance

Testing Realme Note 60 and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Max Frequency 1800 MHz 3210 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75)		 - 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720)
- 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 12 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor n/a Hexagon
Graphics Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 825
GPU Cores 32 1024
GPU Frequency 614 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS 78.6 GFLOPS 2355.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Realme Note 60
420
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
2135
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Realme Note 60
1535
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
6613
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)4202135
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)15356613
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a18374
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo K13 Turbo Pro]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Realme Note 60
250149
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
2050329
CPU90471488465
GPU23788879994
Memory70781358672
UX65109323198
NanoReview Score2501492050329

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 4 GB
- 6 GB
- 8 GB		 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 1866 MHz 4800 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 64 GB
- 128 GB
- 256 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeeMMC 5.1UFS 4.0
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 14 Android 15
UI Skin Realme UI 5.0 ColorOS 15

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max Charging Power 10 W 80 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging No Yes (63% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 0:56 h

Main camera

Matrix 32 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution n/a 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 120 fps (1080p)
Lenses count Standard: 32 MP
Depth		 Standard: 50 MP
Depth: 2 MP
Features Bokeh effect - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix32 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Focal length25 mm27 mm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalOptical

Front camera

Matrix 5 MP 16 MP
Photo resolution n/a 4920x3264 pixels
Aperture n/a f/2.4
Focal length n/a 22 mm
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 720p at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* No Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHzGSM 900/1800MHz
3G BandsWCDMA 1/5/8WCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41)LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66)
LTE category7n/a
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers Mono n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No n/a

Other

Class Budget Mid-range
Announced August, 2024 yr July, 2025 yr
Release Date August, 2024 yr July, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 90 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 359
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 10 W Yes, 80 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo K13 Turbo Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below