Samsung Galaxy A02 vs Tecno Spark Go 3
33
out 100
VS
48
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A02 Manufactured in January, 2021, with display 6.5 with chipsetMediatek MT6739W, vs Tecno Spark Go 3, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A02
- Higher pixel density: 270ppi
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 3
- Larger display: 6.74in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 182g vs 206g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/32 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | PLS TFT | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.5 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82 % | 84.1 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 164 mm (6.46 in) | 167.7 mm (6.6 in) |
| Width | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm (0.36 in) | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Red |
- Black - Gray - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739W | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 1500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 4 (4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | 4/1.5 (Cortex-A53) | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | No |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8100 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 8 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 570 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 9.1 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 470 | 436 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1525 | 1416 |
| CPU | 50286 | 87139 |
| GPU | 6591 | 26538 |
| Memory | 34538 | 102815 |
| UX | 39957 | 69610 |
| NanoReview Score | 131372 | 286102 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 9.4 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI Core 3.1 | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | n/a | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (49% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:54 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2560x1960 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1 (2100), B5(850), B8 (900) | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | January, 2021 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2021 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 100 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 99 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark Go 3 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
