Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Manufactured in December, 2021, with display 6.5 with chipsetUnisoc SC9863A, vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher pixel density: 385ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Lighter design: 190g vs 211g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 4.2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | 2/32 GB | - 4/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | PLS TFT | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.5 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.9 % | 86 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.2 mm (6.46 in) | 164.4 mm (6.47 in) |
| Width | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) | 77.9 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm (0.36 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 211 g (7.44 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP54 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/1.6 (Cortex-A55) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | n/a | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 64 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 550 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 70.4 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 486 | 729 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1533 | 2009 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1257 |
| CPU | 47324 | n/a |
| GPU | 14613 | n/a |
| Memory | 34991 | n/a |
| UX | 22522 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 119450 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 8.8 GB | 22.2 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI Core 4.0 | One UI 7.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-ion |
| Removable | Yes | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (44% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:50 h | 1:28 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 8160x6120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 64 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | No |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2560x1920 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800 | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1 (2100), B5(850), B8 (900) | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | November, 2021 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2021 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 120 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 169 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy A17 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0