Samsung Galaxy A06 5G vs Honor 400 Lite
51
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A06 5G Manufactured in February, 2025, with display 6.7 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 6300, vs Honor 400 Lite, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Honor 400 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 394ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 161g vs 191g
- Higher battery capacity: 5230mAh vs 5000mAh
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | PLS TFT | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1080x2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20.1:9 |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 3500 nits |
| HDR support | No | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.8 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 167.3 mm (6.59 in) | 161 mm (6.34 in) |
| Width | 77.3 mm (3.04 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | n/a |
| Colors | - White - Gray - Green |
- Black - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 144 |
| GPU Frequency | 1072 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 274 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 744 | 956 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1886 | 2303 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 143 |
| CPU | 129192 | 161440 |
| GPU | 70050 | 78966 |
| Memory | 102104 | 116384 |
| UX | 119048 | 140445 |
| NanoReview Score | 420394 | 497235 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 19.4 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | MagicOS 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5230 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 25 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (44% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:25 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6120 pixels | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.67 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2025 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2025 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 130 | 299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 Lite the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
