Samsung Galaxy A10 vs Honor X6c
32
out 100
VS
48
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A10 Manufactured in March, 2019, with display 6.2 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884, vs Honor X6c, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A10
- Higher pixel density: 271ppi
- Lighter design: 168g vs 199g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Honor X6c
- Larger display: 6.61in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5300mAh vs 3400mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 5
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 4/32 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 6.2 in | 6.61 in |
| Resolution | 720x1520 pixels | 720x1604 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 271 ppi | 266 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 1010 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.5 % | 84.6 % |
| sRGB gamut | 90 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 77 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 22 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 2050:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 155.6 mm (6.13 in) | 165 mm (6.5 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 168 g (5.93 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Red |
- White - Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.35 (Cortex-A53) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A73) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G71 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 49.3 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 482 | 430 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1526 | 1394 |
| CPU | 54317 | 84372 |
| GPU | 16914 | 34982 |
| Memory | 49685 | 70145 |
| UX | 33412 | 65156 |
| NanoReview Score | 154328 | 254655 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 9 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 3.1 | MagicOS 9 |
Battery
| Volume | 3400 mAh | 5300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 5 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (30% in 20 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:50 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 07:21 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 10:56 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:29 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 94 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | 8160x6120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | n/a |
| 4K Recording | No | n/a |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 28 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2560x1920 pixels | 2592x1944 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2019 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2019 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 130 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 140 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor X6c the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
