Samsung Galaxy A11 vs Tecno Spark 40C
33
out 100
VS
55
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A11 Manufactured in May, 2020, with display 6.4 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 450, vs Tecno Spark 40C, Manufactured in August, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A11
- Higher pixel density: 268ppi
- Lighter design: 177g vs 190g
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 40C
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 4.2
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.4 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720x1560 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6 % | 84.2 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.4 mm (6.35 in) | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) |
| Width | 76.3 mm (3 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Red |
- White - Black - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (8) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | 8/1.8 (Cortex-A53) | - 6/1.7 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 546 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 506 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 96 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 720 MHz | 820 MHz |
| FLOPS | 115.2 GFLOPS | 78.7 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 489 | 444 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1532 | 1372 |
| CPU | 50498 | 76856 |
| GPU | 14768 | 35386 |
| Memory | 41217 | 64168 |
| UX | 26478 | 69127 |
| NanoReview Score | 133467 | 245537 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 10.4 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 4.1 | HIOS 15.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:50 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 115 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 27 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 5 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 800 / 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2600) | n/a |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2020 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2020 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 190 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 100 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark 40C the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
