Samsung Galaxy A20 vs Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A20 Manufactured in March, 2019, with display 6.4 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884, vs Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G, Manufactured in March, 2025with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A20
- Higher pixel density: 268ppi
- Lighter design: 169g vs 193g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | 3/32 GB | - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.4 in | 6.88 in |
| Resolution | 720x1560 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 268 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9 % | 85.8 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 158.4 mm (6.24 in) | 171.17 mm (6.74 in) |
| Width | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - | - Black - Gold - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.35 (Cortex-A53) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A73) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G71 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 49.3 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 482 | 441 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1526 | 1496 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 708 |
| CPU | 61354 | 91026 |
| GPU | 17164 | 30797 |
| Memory | 48475 | 75780 |
| UX | 38199 | 66310 |
| NanoReview Score | 165192 | 263913 |
| Stability | 85 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 1 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 324 | n/a |
| Writing score | 4872 | n/a |
| Web score | 4726 | n/a |
| Video editing | 3603 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 4769 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 5004 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 3 GB | - 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | One UI 3.1 | Android Go |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (25% in 30 min) | Yes (23% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | 2:30 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
Standard: 32 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 28 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 5 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 12 mm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B5(850), B8 (900) | WCDMA B1/5/82G |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2019 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2019 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 150 | 129 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0