Samsung Galaxy A20s vs Tecno Spark Go 3
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A20s Manufactured in October, 2019, with display 6.5 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 450, vs Tecno Spark Go 3, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A20s
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 3
- Larger display: 6.74in
- Higher pixel density: 260ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 182g vs 183g
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 4.2
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.5 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 720x1560 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 259 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.3 % | 84.1 % |
| sRGB gamut | 94.5 % | n/a |
| Response time | 36 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 914:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) | 167.7 mm (6.6 in) |
| Width | 77.5 mm (3.05 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green - Red |
- Black - Gray - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (8) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | 8/1.8 (Cortex-A53) | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 546 | No |
| Graphics | Adreno 506 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 96 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 115.2 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 476 | 436 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1519 | 1416 |
| CPU | 48967 | 87139 |
| GPU | 14577 | 26538 |
| Memory | 43997 | 102815 |
| UX | 27581 | 69610 |
| NanoReview Score | 135122 | 286102 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 11 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 3.1 | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 40 min) | Yes (49% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:20 h | 1:54 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:55 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 12:11 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:49 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 102 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Depth: 5 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 27 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | September, 2019 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2019 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 190 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 99 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark Go 3 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0