Home Phone comparison Samsung Galaxy A24 4G and Motorola Razr 60 - Which is better?

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Motorola Razr 60

52 out 100
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
VS
64 out 100
Motorola Razr 60
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
Motorola Razr 60

Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Manufactured in May, 2023, with display 6.5 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Motorola Razr 60, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400X. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
  • Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4500mAh
Reasons to choose Motorola Razr 60
  • Larger display: 6.9in
  • Higher pixel density: 413ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Lighter design: 188g vs 195g
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB		 - 8/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G and Motorola Razr 60
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
vs
Motorola Razr 60

Display

Display quality comparison
Type Super AMOLED POLED
Size 6.5 in 6.9 in
Resolution 1080x2340 pixels 1080x2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 22:9
Pixel density 396 ppi 413 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 1000 nits 1200 nits
HDR support No Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 82.5 % 85 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
1003 nits
Motorola Razr 60
1190 nits

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 162.1 mm (6.38 in) 171.3 mm (6.74 in)
Width 77.6 mm (3.06 in) 73.99 mm (2.91 in)
Thickness 8.3 mm (0.33 in) 7.25 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 195 g (6.88 oz) 188 g (6.63 oz)
Water resistance No IP48
Back panel Plastic Eco Leather
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - Black
- Blue
- Green
- Red		 - Gray
- Blue
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
82.5 %
Motorola Razr 60
85 %

Performance

Testing Samsung Galaxy A24 4G and Motorola Razr 60 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Dimensity 7400X
Max Frequency 2200 MHz 2600 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)		 - 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes MediaTek APU 655
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU Cores 128 256
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 512 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
712
Motorola Razr 60
783
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
1900
Motorola Razr 60
2559
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)712783
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)19002559
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a3185
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Motorola Razr 60]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
391953
Motorola Razr 60
708424
CPU140673224809
GPU63763179080
Memory84856132205
UX102661172330
NanoReview Score391953708424
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
1238
Motorola Razr 60
n/a
Stability99 %n/a
Graphics Test7 fpsn/a
Graphics Score1238n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Samsung Galaxy A24 4G]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
9190
Motorola Razr 60
n/a
Writing score11810n/a
Web score8297n/a
Video editing5526n/a
Data manipulation8214n/a
NanoReview Score9190n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 6 GB
- 8 GB		 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity128 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) Android 15
OS Size 26.7 GB n/a
UI Skin One UI 6.0 Hello UI

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
Max Charging Power 25 W 30 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No Yes (15 W)
Reverse Charging No Yes (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes (46% in 30 min) Yes (61% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 1:29 h 0:55 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
27:40
Motorola Razr 60
15:31
Web Browsing09:37 h07:02 h
Video Playback14:45 h11:44 h
Games05:51 h04:09 h
Standby Mode157 h55 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8160x6120 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 120 fps (720p) n/a
Wide-angle lens 123 ° 120 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 5 MP
Macro: 2 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 13 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Focal length27 mm25 mm
SensorSamsung S5KJN1Samsung ISOCELL GN8
Sensor size1/2.761/1.95
Pixel size0.64 μm0.8 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix5 MP13 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
Focal length17 mmn/a
SensorGalaxyCore 5035Sony IMX258
Sensor size1/51/3.0
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 13 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution 4128x3096 pixels 6528x4896 pixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 25 mm 25 mm
Sensor SK Hynix Hi-1339 OmniVision OV32B
Sensor size 1/3.06 1/3.14
Pixel size 1.12 μm 0.7 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*21
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM Standbyn/a
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900GSM 850/900/1800/1900
3G BandsUMTS B1(2100), B5(850), B8(900)WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B39/B40/B41/B48/B66/B71)
LTE category13n/a
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers Mono n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Class Budget Flagship
Announced April, 2023 yr April, 2025 yr
Release Date May, 2023 yr April, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 215 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 799
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Hall Sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included No No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Motorola Razr 60 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below