Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Oppo Reno 15 F

57 out 100

VS

70 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A25 Manufactured in December, 2023, with display 6.5 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1280, vs Oppo Reno 15 F, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A25

Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
Supports Dolby Atmos

Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 15 F

Larger display: 6.57in
Higher pixel density: 397ppi
Lighter design: 195g vs 197g
Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5000mAh
Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 6/256 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Samsung Galaxy A25 and Oppo Reno 15 F

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Samsung Galaxy A25

83

Oppo Reno 15 F

86

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Samsung Galaxy A25

53

Oppo Reno 15 F

77

Performance

App & system performance

Samsung Galaxy A25

36

Oppo Reno 15 F

45

Games

3D gaming performance

Samsung Galaxy A25

27

Oppo Reno 15 F

28

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Samsung Galaxy A25

61

Oppo Reno 15 F

87

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Samsung Galaxy A25

68

Oppo Reno 15 F

69

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Samsung Galaxy A25

57

Oppo Reno 15 F

70

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	Super AMOLED	AMOLED
Size	6.5 in	6.57 in
Resolution	1080x2340 pixels	1080x2372 pixels
Aspect ratio	19.5:9	20:9
Pixel density	396 ppi	397 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	No	Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness	1000 nits	1400 nits
HDR support	No	No
Touch Sampling Rate	n/a	240 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio	84.2 %	88 %
Features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming

Peak brightness (auto)

Samsung Galaxy A25

1027 nits

Oppo Reno 15 F

n/a

sRGB gamut	145.1 %	n/a
PWM (Flicker)	119 Hz	n/a
Response time	1 ms	n/a
Contrast	∞ Infinite	n/a

Sources: NotebookCheck [Samsung Galaxy A25]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	161 mm (6.34 in)	158.18 mm (6.23 in)
Width	76.5 mm (3.01 in)	74.93 mm (2.95 in)
Thickness	8.3 mm (0.33 in)	8.14 mm (0.32 in)
Weight	197 g (6.95 oz)	195 g (6.88 oz)
Water resistance	No	IP69
Cooling system	n/a	Vapor chamber
Back panel	Plastic	Glass
Frame	Plastic	Metal
Colors	- Black - Blue - Yellow	- Blue - Pink
Fingerprint sensor	Yes In-Button	Yes, In-Display

Screen-to-body ratio

Samsung Galaxy A25

84.2 %

Oppo Reno 15 F

88 %

Performance

Testing Samsung Galaxy A25 and Oppo Reno 15 F In benchmarks

Chipset	Samsung Exynos 1280	Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Max Frequency	2400 MHz	2200 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (2 + 6)	8 (4 + 4)
Architecture	- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A78)	- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A78)
Process	Samsung	Samsung
Transistor Size	5 nm	4 nm
Neural Processor	Yes	Yes
Graphics	Mali-G68 MP4	Adreno 710
GPU Cores	256	256
GPU Frequency	972 MHz	676 MHz
FLOPS	487 GFLOPS	346.1 GFLOPS

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Samsung Galaxy A25

972

Oppo Reno 15 F

890

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Samsung Galaxy A25

2089

Oppo Reno 15 F

2579

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	972	890
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	2089	2579
Geekbench Compute (GPU)	n/a	1527

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Samsung Galaxy A25], [Oppo Reno 15 F]

AnTuTu 10

Samsung Galaxy A25

481516

Oppo Reno 15 F

865334

CPU	150314	317576
GPU	106901	102038
Memory	88887	209948
UX	135414	235772
NanoReview Score	481516	865334

Memory

RAM Size	- 6 GB - 8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency	2133 MHz	2133 MHz
Channels	2	2

Storage Capacity	- 128 GB - 256 GB	128 GB
Storage Type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory Card	MicroSD	MicroSD

Software

OS	Android 14	Android 16
OS Size	20 GB	n/a
UI Skin	One UI 6	ColorOS 16

Battery

Volume	5000 mAh	7000 mAh
Max Charging Power	25 W	80 W
Battery Type	Li-ion	Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	No	No
Reverse Charging	No	Yes
Fast Charging	Yes (49% in 30 min)	Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time	1:24 h	1:04 h

Battery Life

Samsung Galaxy A25

18:26

Oppo Reno 15 F

n/a

Web Browsing	06:44 h	n/a
Video Playback	11:34 h	n/a
Games	04:52 h	n/a
Standby Mode	91 h	n/a

Main camera

Matrix	50 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	8160x6120 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Zoom	Digital	Digital
Flash	LED	LED
Stabilization	Optical	Optical
8K Recording	No	No
4K Recording	Yes (Up to 30 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion	240 fps (720p)	240 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens	120 °	112 °
Lenses count	Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP	Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP
Features	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode

Matrix	50 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Focal length	27 mm	26 mm
Sensor	Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1	n/a
Sensor size	1/2.76	1/1.95 (0.51)
Pixel size	0.64 μm	0.8 μm
Autofocus	Phase autofocus	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Optical	Optical

Matrix	8 MP	8 MP
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.2
Focal length	n/a	16 mm
Sensor	Samsung ISOCELL (S5K)4HA	n/a
Sensor size	1/4	1/4.0 (0.25)
Pixel size	1.12 μm	n/a
Stabilization	Digital	Digital

Front camera

Matrix	13 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	4160x3120 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.0
Focal length	n/a	18 mm
Sensor	Hynix Hi-1339	CMOS
Sensor size	1/3.06	n/a
Pixel size	1.12 μm	n/a
Autofocus	No	No
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps	2160p (4K) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5.3	5.1
Bluetooth features	LE	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	n/a	No
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS
NFC*	Yes	Varies by region
Infrared Port	No	No

SIM Count*	2	2
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	Dual SIM Standby	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	No	Yes
Hybrid Slot	Yes	No
2G Bands	GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900	GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G Bands	UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900)	WCDMA /2/4/5/6/8/19
LTE Bands*	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66)	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66/B71)
LTE category	18	n/a
5G Support	Yes	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	n/a
3.5 mm Jack	Yes	No
FM Radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	No

Max Volume

Samsung Galaxy A25

79.6 dB

Oppo Reno 15 F

n/a

Other

Class	Mid-range	Mid-range
Announced	December, 2023 yr	January, 2026 yr
Release Date	December, 2023 yr	January, 2026 yr
Launch Price ($)	299	n/a
Sensors	- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	No	n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 15 F the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Samsung Galaxy A25

0 (0%)

Oppo Reno 15 F

0 (0%)

Total Votes: 0

Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Oppo Reno 15 F

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Results

Survey

User comments