Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Oppo Reno 15

43 out 100

VS

75 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A32 Manufactured in February, 2021, with display 6.4 with chipsetMediatek Helio G80, vs Oppo Reno 15, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A32

Lighter design: 184g vs 197g
Supports Dolby Atmos

Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 15

Larger display: 6.59in
Higher pixel density: 460ppi
Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
Infrared port
Built-in eSIM
Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB

- 8/256 GB
- 8/512 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Samsung Galaxy A32 and Oppo Reno 15

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Samsung Galaxy A32

61

Oppo Reno 15

93

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Samsung Galaxy A32

33

Oppo Reno 15

84

Performance

App & system performance

Samsung Galaxy A32

23

Oppo Reno 15

55

Games

3D gaming performance

Samsung Galaxy A32

19

Oppo Reno 15

35

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Samsung Galaxy A32

64

Oppo Reno 15

85

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Samsung Galaxy A32

62

Oppo Reno 15

77

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Samsung Galaxy A32

43

Oppo Reno 15

75

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	Super AMOLED	AMOLED
Size	6.4 in	6.59 in
Resolution	1080x2400 pixels	1256x2760 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
Pixel density	411 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	No	Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness	800 nits	600 nits
HDR support	No	Yes, HDR10+
Screen-to-body ratio	84.5 %	88.5 %
Features	Always-On Display	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming

Peak brightness (auto)

Samsung Galaxy A32

809 nits

Oppo Reno 15

1312 nits

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	158.9 mm (6.26 in)	158.3 mm (6.23 in)
Width	73.6 mm (2.9 in)	74.83 mm (2.95 in)
Thickness	8.4 mm (0.33 in)	7.77 mm (0.31 in)
Weight	184 g (6.49 oz)	197 g (6.95 oz)
Water resistance	No	IP69
Cooling system	n/a	Vapor chamber
Back panel	Plastic	Glass
Frame	Plastic	Metal
Colors	- White - Black - Blue - Purple	- White - Blue
Fingerprint sensor	Yes In-Display	Yes, In-Display

Screen-to-body ratio

Samsung Galaxy A32

84.5 %

Oppo Reno 15

88.5 %

Performance

Testing Samsung Galaxy A32 and Oppo Reno 15 In benchmarks

Chipset	Mediatek Helio G80	Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
Max Frequency	2000 MHz	2800 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (2 + 6)	8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture	- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75)	- 3/1.84 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-520)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-720)) - 1/2.8 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-720))
Process	TSMC	TSMC
Transistor Size	12 nm	4 nm
Neural Processor	Yes	Yes
Graphics	Mali-G52 MP2	n/a
GPU Cores	48	n/a
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	n/a
FLOPS	91.2 GFLOPS	n/a

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Samsung Galaxy A32

511

Oppo Reno 15

1270

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Samsung Galaxy A32

1556

Oppo Reno 15

4106

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	511	1270
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	1556	4106

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo Reno 15]

AnTuTu 10

Samsung Galaxy A32

236489

Oppo Reno 15

1394716

CPU	84269	481018
GPU	47222	327987
Memory	43479	249030
UX	61519	336681
NanoReview Score	236489	1394716

Memory

RAM Size	- 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency	1866 MHz	n/a
Channels	2	4

Storage Capacity	- 64 GB - 128 GB	256 GB
Storage Type	eMMC 5.1	UFS 3.1
Memory Card	MicroSD	No

Software

OS	Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13)	Android 16
OS Size	18.6 GB	n/a
UI Skin	One UI 5.0	ColorOS 16

Battery

Volume	5000 mAh	6500 mAh
Max Charging Power	15 W	80 W
Battery Type	Li-ion	Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	No	No
Reverse Charging	No	Yes
Fast Charging	Yes (25% in 30 min)	Yes (68% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time	2:19 h	0:57 h

Battery Life

Samsung Galaxy A32

22:11

Oppo Reno 15

29:05

Web Browsing	08:05 h	11:50 h
Video Playback	12:48 h	17:46 h
Games	05:29 h	06:35 h
Standby Mode	116 h	139 h

Main camera

Matrix	64 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	9216x6912 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Zoom	Digital	Optical, 3.5x
Flash	LED	LED
Stabilization	Digital	Optical
8K Recording	No	No
4K Recording	No	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 30 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion	120 fps (720p)	120 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens	123 °	116 °
Lenses count	Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 5 MP Depth: 5 MP	Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode

Matrix	64 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Focal length	26 mm	26 mm
Sensor	n/a	Sony LYT-600
Sensor size	n/a	1/1.95 (0.51)
Pixel size	n/a	0.8 μm
Autofocus	Phase autofocus	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Digital	Optical

Matrix	n/a	50 MP
Aperture	n/a	f/2.8
Focal length	n/a	85 mm
Sensor	n/a	Samsung ISOCELL JN5
Sensor size	n/a	1/2.76 (0.36)
Pixel size	n/a	0.64 μm
Stabilization	n/a	Optical

Matrix	8 MP	8 MP
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.2
Focal length	13 mm	15 mm
Sensor	n/a	OmniVision OV08D
Sensor size	1/4.0	1/4.0 (0.25)
Pixel size	1.12 μm	1.12 μm
Stabilization	Digital	Digital

Front camera

Matrix	20 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	5380x3620 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.0
Focal length	n/a	18 mm
Sensor	CMOS	Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5
Sensor size	n/a	1/2.76 (0.36)
Pixel size	n/a	0.64 μm
Autofocus	No	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps	2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5	5.4
Bluetooth features	PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	n/a	No
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS
NFC*	No	Varies by region
Infrared Port	No	Yes

SIM Count*	2	2
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	Dual SIM Standby	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	No	Yes
Hybrid Slot	No	No
2G Bands	GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900	GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G Bands	UMTS B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B5(850), B8 (900)	WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8
LTE Bands*	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28)	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B66/B71)
LTE category	12	n/a
5G Support	No	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Mono	n/a
3.5 mm Jack	Yes	No
FM Radio	Yes	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	No

Other

Class	Mid-range	Mid-range
Announced	February, 2021 yr	January, 2026 yr
Release Date	February, 2021 yr	January, 2026 yr
Launch Price ($)	250	n/a
MSRP ($)	n/a	549
Sensors	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	n/a	Yes, 80 W

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 15 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Samsung Galaxy A32

0 (0%)

Oppo Reno 15

0 (0%)

Total Votes: 0

Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Oppo Reno 15

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Results

Survey

User comments