Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Samsung Galaxy A02
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A32 Manufactured in February, 2021, with display 6.4 with chipsetMediatek Helio G80, vs Samsung Galaxy A02, Manufactured in January, 2021 with chipsetMediatek MT6739W. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A32
- Higher pixel density: 411ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Lighter design: 184g vs 206g
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A02
- Larger display: 6.5in
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/32 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | PLS TFT |
| Size | 6.4 in | 6.5 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5 % | 82 % |
| Features | Always-On Display | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 158.9 mm (6.26 in) | 164 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 73.6 mm (2.9 in) | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 9.1 mm (0.36 in) |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Purple |
- Black - Blue - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 | Mediatek MT6739W |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 4 (4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
4/1.5 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 8 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 570 MHz |
| FLOPS | 91.2 GFLOPS | 9.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 511 | 470 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1556 | 1525 |
| CPU | 84269 | 50286 |
| GPU | 47222 | 6591 |
| Memory | 43479 | 34538 |
| UX | 61519 | 39957 |
| NanoReview Score | 236489 | 131372 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
2 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | 18.6 GB | 9.4 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 5.0 | One UI Core 3.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | n/a |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (25% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 2:19 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:05 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 12:48 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:29 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 116 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9216x6912 pixels | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | No |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 5 MP Depth: 5 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 20 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5380x3620 pixels | 2560x1960 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B5(850), B8 (900) | UMTS B1 (2100), B5(850), B8 (900) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 12 | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2021 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2021 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 250 | 100 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy A32 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0