Samsung Galaxy A57 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C81
71
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A57 5G Manufactured in April, 2026, with display 6.7 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 1680, vs Xiaomi Poco C81, Manufactured in April, 2026 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
- Higher pixel density: 385ppi
- Lighter design: 179g vs 208g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C81
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher battery capacity: 6300mAh vs 5000mAh
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1200 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.8 % | 84.2 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.5 mm (6.36 in) | 171.6 mm (6.76 in) |
| Width | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) | 79.5 mm (3.13 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Purple |
- Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2900 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 3/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/2.9 (Cortex-A720) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1389 | 430 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4453 | 1462 |
| CPU | 510705 | 144072 |
| GPU | 374535 | 20274 |
| Memory | 204469 | 76639 |
| UX | 300346 | 85784 |
| NanoReview Score | 1390055 | 326769 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | One UI 8.5 | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (64% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:09 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 10:41 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 20:15 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:40 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 85 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | No |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Macro: 5 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX906 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 (0.64) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX258 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 (0.33) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2 (0.31) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2026 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2026 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 549 | 100 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy A57 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
