Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A72 Manufactured in March, 2021, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, Manufactured in June, 2020 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A72
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Lighter design: 199g vs 203g
- Higher battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 5000mAh
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.53 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8 % | 83.5 % |
| Features | Always-On Display | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 98.7 % | 97.7 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 367 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 4.8 ms | 32.2 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 4608:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 165 mm (6.5 in) | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 77.4 mm (3.05 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP67 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Pink |
- White - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.3 (Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 692 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 618 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 661 | 516 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1783 | 1562 |
| CPU | 132249 | 89155 |
| GPU | 74109 | 49694 |
| Memory | 72736 | 60565 |
| UX | 104059 | 72643 |
| NanoReview Score | 383153 | 272057 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 38.2 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1038 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9514 | n/a |
| Web score | 7307 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6296 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 7498 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8967 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
- 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | 25.8 GB | 16.5 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 6.0 | MIUI 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5020 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 25 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (54% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:15 h | 1:30 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:35 h | 09:31 h |
| Video Playback | 13:14 h | 14:21 h |
| Games | 05:11 h | 05:45 h |
| Standby Mode | 144 h | 121 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9000x7000 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | 118 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Macro: 5 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KGM1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08A10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 55 | n/a |
| Preview | 60 | n/a |
| Zoom | 76 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.3 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 29 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Active | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 / 2300 / 2500 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8 (900) | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B26/B28/B32/B66) | LTE (B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | 15 | 7 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2021 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2021 yr | June, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 450 | 199 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy A72 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0