Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Vivo V60 Lite 5G

57 out 100

VS

69 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy A73 5G Manufactured in April, 2022, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 778G, vs Vivo V60 Lite 5G, Manufactured in September, 2025 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

Higher pixel density: 393ppi
Lighter design: 181g vs 194g
Supports Dolby Atmos

Reasons to choose Vivo V60 Lite 5G

Larger display: 6.77in
Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

76

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

89

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

54

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

65

Performance

App & system performance

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

40

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

47

Games

3D gaming performance

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

30

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

26

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

66

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

93

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

71

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

74

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

57

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

69

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	Super AMOLED	AMOLED
Size	6.7 in	6.77 in
Resolution	1080x2400 pixels	1080x2392 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
Pixel density	393 ppi	388 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	No	Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness	500 nits	n/a
HDR support	Yes HDR10	Yes, HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate	n/a	300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio	87 %	88.6 %
Features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	163.7 mm (6.44 in)	163.77 mm (6.45 in)
Width	76.1 mm (3 in)	76.28 mm (3 in)
Thickness	7.6 mm (0.3 in)	7.59 mm (0.3 in)
Weight	181 g (6.38 oz)	194 g (6.84 oz)
Water resistance	IP67	IP65
Back panel	Plastic	n/a
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Colors	- White - Gray - Green	- Black - Blue - Pink
Fingerprint sensor	Yes In-Display	Yes, In-Display

Screen-to-body ratio

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

87 %

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

88.6 %

Performance

Testing Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G In benchmarks

Chipset	Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G	Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo
Max Frequency	2400 MHz	2500 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (1 + 3 + 4)	8 (2 + 6)
Architecture	- 4/1.8 (Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)) - 1/2.4 (Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78))	- 6/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/3 (Cortex-A715)
Process	TSMC	TSMC
Transistor Size	6 nm	4 nm
Neural Processor	Hexagon 770	MediaTek APU 657
Graphics	Adreno 642	Mali-G610 MP4
GPU Cores	512	256
GPU Frequency	550 MHz	1300 MHz
FLOPS	844 GFLOPS	665.6 GFLOPS

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

920

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

1023

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

2791

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

2817

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	920	1023
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	2791	2817
Geekbench Compute (GPU)	n/a	2525

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Samsung Galaxy A73 5G], [Vivo V60 Lite 5G]

AnTuTu 10

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

579837

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

908244

CPU	207203	339607
GPU	138493	126506
Memory	95482	203622
UX	138659	238509
NanoReview Score	579837	908244

3DMark Wild Life

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

2457

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

n/a

Stability	98 %	n/a
Graphics Test	14 fps	n/a
Graphics Score	2457	n/a

Sources: 3DMark [Samsung Galaxy A73 5G]

PCMark 3.0

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

12127

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

n/a

Writing score	14071	n/a
Web score	10580	n/a
Video editing	7243	n/a
Data manipulation	9125	n/a
NanoReview Score	12127	n/a

Memory

RAM Size	- 6 GB - 8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency	2133 MHz	2133 MHz
Channels	2	2

Storage Capacity	- 128 GB - 256 GB	256 GB
Storage Type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory Card	MicroSD	No

Software

OS	Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14)	Android 15
OS Size	36.9 GB	n/a
UI Skin	One UI 6.1	Funtouch OS 15

Battery

Volume	5000 mAh	6500 mAh
Max Charging Power	25 W	90 W
Battery Type	Li-Po	Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	No	No
Reverse Charging	No	No
Fast Charging	Yes (45% in 30 min)	Yes (50% in 21 min)
Full Charge Time	1:24 h	0:52 h

Main camera

Matrix	108 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	12000x9000 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Zoom	Digital	Digital
Flash	LED	Quad LED
Stabilization	Optical	Digital
8K Recording	No	No
4K Recording	Yes (Up to 30 fps)	Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion	240 fps (720p)	n/a
Wide-angle lens	n/a	120 °
Lenses count	Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Macro: 5 MP Depth: 5 MP	Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode

Matrix	108 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Sensor	Samsung ISOCELL HM6	Sony IMX882
Sensor size	1/1.67	1/1.95
Pixel size	0.64 μm	0.8 μm
Autofocus	Phase autofocus	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Optical	Digital

Matrix	12 MP	8 MP
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.2
Sensor	Sony IMX258	n/a
Sensor size	1/3.06	n/a
Pixel size	1.12 μm	n/a
Stabilization	Digital	Digital

Front camera

Matrix	32 MP	32 MP
Photo resolution	6464x4864 pixels	n/a
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.5
Focal length	26 mm	22 mm
Sensor	Sony IMX616	n/a
Sensor size	1/2.8	1/3.1
Pixel size	0.8 μm	n/a
Autofocus	No	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	2160p (4K) at 30 fps	1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5	5.4
Bluetooth features	PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	n/a	No
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS
NFC*	Varies by region	Yes
Infrared Port	No	No

SIM Count*	2	2
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	Dual SIM Standby	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	No	No
Hybrid Slot	Yes	No
2G Bands	GSM GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900	GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
3G Bands	UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900)	WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8
LTE Bands*	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66)	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B28)
LTE category	18	n/a
5G Support	Yes	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	n/a
3.5 mm Jack	No	No
FM Radio	n/a	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	No

Other

Class	Mid-range	Mid-range
Announced	March, 2022 yr	September, 2025 yr
Release Date	April, 2022 yr	September, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($)	465	n/a
Sensors	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	No	Yes, 90 W

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo V60 Lite 5G the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G

0 (0%)

Vivo V60 Lite 5G

0 (0%)

Total Votes: 0

Samsung Galaxy A73 5G vs Vivo V60 Lite 5G

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Results

Survey

User comments