Samsung Galaxy M05 vs Samsung Galaxy A01
45
out 100
VS
31
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy M05 Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 6.7 with chipsetMediatek Helio G85, vs Samsung Galaxy A01, Manufactured in February, 2020 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 439. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy M05
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 4.2
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A01
- Higher pixel density: 301ppi
- Lighter design: 149g vs 195g
Versions
| Memory Options | 4/64 GB | - 2/16 GB - 2/32 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | PLS TFT | TFT LCD |
| Size | 6.7 in | 5.7 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 720x1520 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 262 ppi | 301 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 430 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1 % | 77 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 168.8 mm (6.65 in) | 146.2 mm (5.76 in) |
| Width | 78.2 mm (3.08 in) | 70.9 mm (2.79 in) |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 149 g (5.26 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Green | - Black - Blue - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.45 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 536 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 505 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 450 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 420 | 477 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1399 | 1521 |
| CPU | 83891 | 55975 |
| GPU | 29891 | 15438 |
| Memory | 57891 | 50884 |
| UX | 72102 | 24230 |
| NanoReview Score | 243775 | 146527 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | n/a | 7.1 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 6.0 Core | One UI Core 4.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 25 W | n/a |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (42% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:28 h | 2:10 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 28 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 2560x1960 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 720p at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 7 | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | December, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2024 yr | February, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 100 | 110 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | No | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy M05 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
