Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
63
out 100
VS
51
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra Manufactured in August, 2020, with display 6.9 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 990, vs Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, Manufactured in June, 2019 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 855. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher pixel density: 496ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
- Lighter design: 191g vs 208g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/128 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.9 in | 6.39 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3088 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (10-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.8 % | 86.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 96.9 % | 142.2 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 245 Hz | 223 Hz |
| Response time | 6 ms | 6.5 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.8 mm (6.49 in) | 156.7 mm (6.17 in) |
| Width | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) | 74.3 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Brown |
- White - Black - Blue - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
| Max Frequency | 2730 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A76) - 2/2.73 (Exynos M5) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.84 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 690 |
| Graphics | Mali-G77 MP11 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Cores | 704 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 585 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1126 GFLOPS | 898.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1173 | 933 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3168 | 2405 |
| CPU | 207699 | 200133 |
| GPU | 247886 | 193659 |
| Memory | 144292 | 104050 |
| UX | 165504 | 123595 |
| NanoReview Score | 765381 | 621437 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 37.3 °C | 44.1 °C |
| Stability | 49 % | 88 % |
| Graphics Test | 25 fps | 18 fps |
| Graphics Score | 4250 | 3022 |
| Writing score | 12145 | 11471 |
| Web score | 8848 | 7040 |
| Video editing | 6906 | 5961 |
| Data manipulation | 8762 | 8050 |
| NanoReview Score | 10807 | 9555 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | n/a | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | 34.7 GB | 19 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 5.0 | MIUI 12.5 |
Battery
| Volume | 4500 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 25 W | 27 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (15 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (43% in 30 min) | Yes Quick Charge 4+ (40% in 20 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | 1:11 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:27 h | 07:54 h |
| Video Playback | 12:33 h | 12:39 h |
| Games | 05:16 h | 04:50 h |
| Standby Mode | 81 h | 109 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 240 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 124 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.33 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 103 mm | 53 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3M5 | Omnivision OV8856 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K2L3 | Samsung S5K3L6 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 10 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3872x2592 pixels | 5184x3880 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX374 | Samsung S5K3T2 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2 | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 700 / 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 / 2600 / 2000 / 2300 / 2500 | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B700/B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2000/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B800/B850/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | 20 | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | August, 2020 yr | May, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2020 yr | June, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1299 | 450 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
