Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy S22 Manufactured in March, 2022, with display 6.1 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 2200, vs Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global), Manufactured in July, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S22
- Lighter design: 167g vs 188g
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
- Larger display: 6.32in
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6700mAh vs 3700mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.1 in | 6.32 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1216x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 425 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (10-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 780 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6 % | 89.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.3 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 239 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 10 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 146 mm (5.75 in) | 151.21 mm (5.95 in) |
| Width | 70.6 mm (2.78 in) | 72.42 mm (2.85 in) |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm (0.3 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 167 g (5.89 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue - Green - Pink - Purple - Yellow |
- White - Black - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2200 | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.82 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.52 (Cortex-A710) - 1/2.8 (Cortex-X2) |
- 4/2.2 (Cortex-A725) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A725) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-A725) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 920 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 768 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1306 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 2006.2 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1612 | 1567 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3796 | 5965 |
| CPU | 302471 | 612932 |
| GPU | 373644 | 952016 |
| Memory | 174962 | 394012 |
| UX | 237420 | 470174 |
| NanoReview Score | 1088497 | 2429134 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 38 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 60 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 39 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 6530 | n/a |
| Writing score | 15127 | n/a |
| Web score | 10324 | n/a |
| Video editing | 7244 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 10926 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 12422 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 30.2 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 5.1 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 3700 mAh | 6700 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 25 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (15 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (63% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:03 h | 1:03 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:10 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:44 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:49 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 100 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6120 pixels | 16320x12240 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 116 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 10 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung GN5 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.5 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 10 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 80 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX772 | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.94 | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX713 | GalaxyCore GC50F6 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/2.88 (0.35) |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 0.61 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 72 | n/a |
| Zoom | 126 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 10 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3872x2592 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.24 | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2 (1900), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B8 (900) | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4 (1700/2100 AWS A-F), B5 (850), B8 (900) | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B(/B(1700/B1/B1)/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66/B1900)/B2100/B2100)/B2300)/B2500)/B2600)) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February, 2022 yr | June, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2022 yr | July, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 799 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 899 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0