Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Huawei Honor 10
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 6.8 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (for Galaxy), vs Huawei Honor 10, Manufactured in April, 2018 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 970. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 501ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3400mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 4.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Huawei Honor 10
- Lighter design: 153g vs 232g
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 12/1024 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.8 in | 5.84 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3088 pixels | 1080x2280 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.9:9 |
| Pixel density | 501 ppi | 432 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 2600 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.5 % | 77.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 99.5 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 480 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 1423:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) | 149.6 mm (5.89 in) |
| Width | 79 mm (3.11 in) | 71.2 mm (2.8 in) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 232 g (8.18 oz) | 153 g (5.4 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Blue - Green - Orange - Purple - Yellow |
- White - Black - Gray - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (for Galaxy) | HiSilicon Kirin 970 |
| Max Frequency | 3390 MHz | 2360 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.84 (Cortex A53) - 4/2.36 (Cortex A73) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Mali-G72 MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 216 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 767 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 331.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2271 | 526 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7119 | 1570 |
| CPU | 432608 | 80042 |
| GPU | 801870 | 106499 |
| Memory | 418926 | 81766 |
| UX | 301299 | 85160 |
| NanoReview Score | 1954703 | 353467 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 46.8 °C | 40 °C |
| Stability | 59 % | 75 % |
| Graphics Test | 96 fps | 4 fps |
| Graphics Score | 16056 | 827 |
| Writing score | 22590 | 6772 |
| Web score | 18325 | 5225 |
| Video editing | 8000 | 5075 |
| Data manipulation | 15921 | 5611 |
| NanoReview Score | 18029 | 6542 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 1833 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 8.1 (Upgradeable to Android 10.0) |
| OS Size | 28 GB | 13 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 6.1 | EMUI 12 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 225 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (15 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (69% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 25 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:05 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:18 h | 06:33 h |
| Video Playback | 18:00 h | 09:58 h |
| Games | 05:51 h | 04:09 h |
| Standby Mode | 122 h | 72 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 16320x12240 pixels | 4616x3464 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 240 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 16 MP Monochrome: 24 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP2 | Sony IMX498 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.3 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.6 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/3.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 111 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX854 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.52 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX564 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 82 | n/a |
| Zoom | 145 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 24 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | 5760x4312 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3LU | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.9 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) | LTE (B800/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | 20 | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | April, 2018 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2024 yr | April, 2018 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1299 | 450 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | n/a |
Note
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra:
There is a model with two physical SIM cards and no eSIM, and another with one physical SIM card and eSIM support.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0