Samsung Galaxy S25 FE vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Manufactured in September, 2025, with display 6.7 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 2400, vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite, Manufactured in July, 2020with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 765G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 190g vs 192g
- Higher battery capacity: 4900mAh vs 4160mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 401ppi
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.57 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2 % | 85.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 241 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 9 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.3 mm (6.35 in) | 163.7 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 76.6 mm (3.02 in) | 74.8 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue - Yellow |
- White - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 1 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.9 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 1/2.2 (Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)) - 1/2.4 (Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 696 |
| Graphics | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Adreno 620 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 384 |
| GPU Frequency | 1095 MHz | 750 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3406.8 GFLOPS | 576 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2116 | 820 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7035 | 2025 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 18270 | n/a |
| CPU | 429356 | 146064 |
| GPU | 715844 | 100468 |
| Memory | 352083 | 93251 |
| UX | 303719 | 115080 |
| NanoReview Score | 1801002 | 454863 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 43.7 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 10 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 1673 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | 23.8 GB | 21 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 8.0 | MIUI 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 4900 mAh | 4160 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 20 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (25 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (30% in 20 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:15 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 08:51 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:42 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:53 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 92 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6120 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 5 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV48B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 75 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV8856 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4920x3264 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 | GSM 700 / 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 / 2600 / 2000 / 2300 / 2500 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) | UMTS 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66) | LTE (B700/B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2000/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | 20 | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2025 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2025 yr | July, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 315 |
| MSRP ($) | 649 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy S25 FE the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0