Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 10
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy S25 Manufactured in February, 2025, with display 6.2 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Samsung Galaxy Note 10, Manufactured in August, 2019with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S25
- Higher pixel density: 416ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 162g vs 168g
- Higher battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Note 10
- Larger display: 6.3in
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/128 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.2 in | 6.3 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1080x2280 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19:9 |
| Pixel density | 416 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 2600 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1 % | 91.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 97.4 % | 97.1 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 240 Hz | 236 Hz |
| Response time | 2 ms | 8 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 146.9 mm (5.78 in) | 151 mm (5.94 in) |
| Width | 70.5 mm (2.78 in) | 71.8 mm (2.83 in) |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm (0.28 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 162 g (5.71 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Gray - Blue - Green - Pink |
- White - Black - Blue - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825 |
| Max Frequency | 4470 MHz | 2730 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A75) - 2/2.73 (M4) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 432 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 770 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 651.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3075 | 957 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9822 | 2512 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 26264 | n/a |
| CPU | 580139 | 153515 |
| GPU | 961299 | 210357 |
| Memory | 478741 | 150340 |
| UX | 362794 | 129814 |
| NanoReview Score | 2382973 | 644026 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 48.6 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 78 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 20 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3345 |
| Writing score | n/a | 9229 |
| Web score | n/a | 6604 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5834 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 6760 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 8546 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | 30.1 GB | 20 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 7.0 | One UI 4.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 3500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 25 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes Qi/PMA (12 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (56% in 30 min) | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (55% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:17 h | 1:30 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:09 h | 06:34 h |
| Video Playback | 17:15 h | 11:12 h |
| Games | 05:32 h | 04:27 h |
| Standby Mode | 108 h | 84 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6120 pixels | 4000x3000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 10 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 12 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 16 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 - 2.4 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5KGN3 | Samsung SAK2L4 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/2.55 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.4 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 10 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 67 mm | 52 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL S5K3K1 | Samsung S5K3M3 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.94 | 1/3.6 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX564 | Samsung S5K3P9 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 10 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | 3648x2736 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3LU | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2 | 1/2.65 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM850,GSM900,DCS1800,PCS1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 CDMA 800 / 1900 - USA |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1(2100),B2(1900),B4(AWS),B5(850),B8(900) | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B66/B71) | LTE (B(2000/B)/B20/B150) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2025 yr | August, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2025 yr | August, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 949 |
| MSRP ($) | 799 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | n/a |
Note
Samsung Galaxy S25:
Supports up to 2 eSIMs. The international model has 2 physical SIM slots, while the U.S. model has 1.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy S25 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0