Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G
48
out 100
VS
64
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Manufactured in March, 2018, with display 6.2 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9 Octa 9810, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G, Manufactured in December, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
- Higher pixel density: 531ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G
- Larger display: 6.77in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 183.7g vs 189g
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.2 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 1440x2960 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 18.5:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 531 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 631 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | Always-On Display | DCI-P3 |
| PWM (Flicker) | 215 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 7 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 158.1 mm (6.22 in) | 164 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 73.8 mm (2.91 in) | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 183.7 g (6.48 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP64 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Gray - Red - Purple |
- Black - Blue - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9810 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.9 (Exynos M3) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G72 MP18 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 324 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 572 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 370.6 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 751 | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1909 | 2025 |
| CPU | 142642 | 132724 |
| GPU | 140091 | 72238 |
| Memory | 99705 | 109980 |
| UX | 84991 | 122242 |
| NanoReview Score | 467429 | 437184 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 40.7 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 95 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 13 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 2328 | n/a |
| Writing score | 6167 | n/a |
| Web score | 5425 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5459 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5611 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6261 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1794 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 8.0 (Upgradeable to Android 10) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 13.9 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | One UI 2.5 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 3500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes Qi/PMA (10 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (40% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:40 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 06:05 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 10:25 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:17 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 84 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4032x3024 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 240 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12 MP Telephoto: 12 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 - 2.4 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung SAK2L3 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/1.67 (0.6) |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 52 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3H1 | Omnivision OV02F |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6 | 1/5 (0.2) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 1.75 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1440p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B700/B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | n/a |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2018 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2018 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 840 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
