Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
76
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 Manufactured in August, 2023, with display 7.6 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G, Manufactured in March, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
- Larger display: 7.6in
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Lighter design: 205g vs 253g
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4400mAh
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 12/1024 GB |
- 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 7.6 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1812x2176 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 10.81:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 374 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (10-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.1 % | 85.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 94.7 % | 89.4 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | 479 Hz |
| Response time | 4 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 154.9 mm (6.1 in) | 164.19 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 129.9 mm (5.11 in) | 76.1 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 6.1 mm (0.24 in) | 8.12 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 253 g (8.92 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX8 | IP53 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Blue - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max Frequency | 3360 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2062 | 916 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5396 | 2122 |
| CPU | 384437 | 144724 |
| GPU | 561497 | 83265 |
| Memory | 277544 | 98212 |
| UX | 274646 | 106667 |
| NanoReview Score | 1498124 | 432868 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 48.9 °C | 38.1 °C |
| Stability | 50 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 72 fps | 7 fps |
| Graphics Score | 12123 | 1200 |
| Writing score | 19427 | 10885 |
| Web score | 14304 | 7057 |
| Video editing | 7895 | 4065 |
| Data manipulation | 13075 | 7763 |
| NanoReview Score | 15647 | 8274 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 34 GB | 26 GB |
| UI Skin | One UI 6.1 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 4400 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 25 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (15 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:24 h | 0:49 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:04 h | 07:50 h |
| Video Playback | 12:40 h | 12:38 h |
| Games | 05:13 h | 05:34 h |
| Standby Mode | 126 h | 110 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6120 pixels | 12032x9024 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 123 ° | 118 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 10 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung GN3 | Samsung S5KHM2 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57 | 1/1.52 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 10 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 66 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3K1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.94 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX258 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.14 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 76 | n/a |
| Zoom | 128 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 10 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3648x2736 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX374 | Omnivision OV16A1Q |
| Sensor size | 1/3.2 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900) | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 6, 19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 20 | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2023 yr | February, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2023 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1799 | 250 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
