Sony Xperia 5 II vs Vivo X200T
Compared 2 smartphones : Sony Xperia 5 II Manufactured in October, 2020, with display 6.1 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865, vs Vivo X200T, Manufactured in February, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Sony Xperia 5 II
- Lighter design: 163g vs 205g
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Vivo X200T
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.1 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2520 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 449 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.8 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 100 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 238 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 8 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 158 mm (6.22 in) | 160.01 mm (6.3 in) |
| Width | 68 mm (2.68 in) | 74.29 mm (2.92 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Blue - Pink |
- Black - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2840 MHz | 3730 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 698 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Adreno 650 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 587 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1202.1 GFLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1230 | 2546 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3405 | 8314 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 21754 |
| CPU | 236582 | 625616 |
| GPU | 192490 | 1312222 |
| Memory | 132271 | 509411 |
| UX | 184805 | 459201 |
| NanoReview Score | 746148 | 2906450 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 45.9 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 91 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 22 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3835 | n/a |
| Writing score | 15545 | n/a |
| Web score | 9996 | n/a |
| Video editing | 7188 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 9618 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 12685 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 13 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | n/a | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4000 mAh | 6200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 21 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (45% in 30 min) | Yes (70% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:49 h | 0:54 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:29 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 12:46 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:22 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 96 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4000x3000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 124 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 12 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX557 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7 | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 1.8 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3T2 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | 1/1.95 (0.51) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX363 | Samsung JD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55 | 1/3.14 (0.32) |
| Pixel size | 1.4 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K4H7 | Samsung KD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/3.44 (0.29) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4(1700/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B46/B66(1700/B2100)) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 22 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2020 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2020 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 950 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 650 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200T the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0