Home Phone comparison Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Honor 400 - Which is better?

Tecno Camon 19 Pro vs Honor 400

52 out 100
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
VS
73 out 100
Honor 400
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Honor 400

Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 19 Pro Manufactured in July, 2022, with display 6.8 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G96, vs Honor 400, Manufactured in May, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 19 Pro
  • Larger display: 6.8in
Reasons to choose Honor 400
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Lighter design: 184g vs 204g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5300mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Infrared port
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB		 - 8/256 GB
- 8/512 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Honor 400
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
vs
Honor 400

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD AMOLED
Size 6.8 in 6.55 in
Resolution 1080x2460 pixels 1264x2736 pixels
Aspect ratio 20.5:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 395 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
Max brightness 480 nits n/a
HDR support No Yes HDR10+
Screen-to-body ratio 88.3 % 90.2 %
Features n/a - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
476 nits
Honor 400
n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 166.79 mm (6.57 in) 156.5 mm (6.16 in)
Width 74.55 mm (2.94 in) 74.6 mm (2.94 in)
Thickness 8.58 mm (0.34 in) 7.3 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 204 g (7.2 oz) 184 g (6.49 oz)
Water resistance No IP66
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Plastic n/a
Frame Plastic n/a
Colors - Black
- Blue		 - Black
- Silver
- Gold
- Blue
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
88.3 %
Honor 400
90.2 %

Performance

Testing Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Honor 400 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G96 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Max Frequency 2050 MHz 2630 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.05 (Cortex-A76)		 - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510))
- 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715))
- 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 12 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU Yes
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 720
GPU Cores 128 512
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 975 MHz
FLOPS 243 GFLOPS 998.4 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
670
Honor 400
1142
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
1791
Honor 400
3180
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)6701142
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)17913180
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a4046
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Honor 400]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
380330
Honor 400
854878
CPU121229267068
GPU60733234936
Memory90588193158
UX107790159716
NanoReview Score380330854878
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
1173
Honor 400
n/a
Stability99 %n/a
Graphics Test7 fpsn/a
Graphics Score1173n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Tecno Camon 19 Pro]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
9292
Honor 400
n/a
Writing score12566n/a
Web score7874n/a
Video editing5179n/a
Data manipulation6571n/a
NanoReview Score9292n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 128 GB
- 256 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.1UFS 3.1
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) Android 15
UI Skin HIOS 13 MagicOS 9

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 5300 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 66 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes (47% in 30 min) Yes (44% in 15 min)
Full Charge Time 1:28 h 0:57 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
22:29
Honor 400
n/a
Web Browsing07:34 hn/a
Video Playback12:10 hn/a
Games05:08 hn/a
Standby Mode128 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 64 MP 200 MP
Photo resolution 9000x7000 pixels n/a
Zoom Optical, 2x Digital
Flash Quad LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Wide-angle lens n/a 112 °
Lenses count Standard: 64 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Depth: 2 MP		 Standard: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 12 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix64 MP200 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Focal length26 mmn/a
SensorSamsung S5KGWBSamsung ISOCELL HP3
Sensor size1/1.71/1.4
Pixel size0.8 μm0.56 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.0n/a
Focal length50 mmn/a
SensorSamsung S5KJN1n/a
Sensor size1/2.76n/a
Pixel size0.64 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrixn/a12 MP
Aperturen/af/2.2
Stabilizationn/aDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution n/a 8192x6144 pixels
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.1
Focal length 26 mm n/a
Sensor Samsung S5KGD2 n/a
Sensor size 1/3.4 n/a
Pixel size 0.8 μm 0.64 μm
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Varies by region Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers Mono n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos No n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced June, 2022 yr May, 2025 yr
Release Date July, 2022 yr May, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 200 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 499
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes 66 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
2 (100%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below