Home Phone comparison Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Vivo X200s - Which is better?

Tecno Camon 19 Pro vs Vivo X200s

52 out 100
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
VS
89 out 100
Vivo X200s
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
Vivo X200s

Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 19 Pro Manufactured in July, 2022, with display 6.8 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G96, vs Vivo X200s, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 19 Pro
  • Larger display: 6.8in
  • Lighter design: 204g vs 205g
Reasons to choose Vivo X200s
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Vivo X200s
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
vs
Vivo X200s

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD AMOLED
Size 6.8 in 6.67 in
Resolution 1080x2460 pixels 1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20.5:9 20:9
Pixel density 395 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
Max brightness 480 nits n/a
HDR support No Yes Dolby Vision
Screen-to-body ratio 88.3 % 90.3 %
Features n/a - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
476 nits
Vivo X200s
n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 166.79 mm (6.57 in) 160.1 mm (6.3 in)
Width 74.55 mm (2.94 in) 74.29 mm (2.92 in)
Thickness 8.58 mm (0.34 in) 7.99 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 204 g (7.2 oz) 205 g (7.23 oz)
Water resistance No IP69
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Plastic n/a
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - Black
- Blue		 - Silver
- Gray
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
88.3 %
Vivo X200s
90.3 %

Performance

Testing Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Vivo X200s In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Max Frequency 2050 MHz 3730 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.05 (Cortex-A76)		 - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 12 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU MediaTek NPU 890
Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU Cores 128 1536
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS 243 GFLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
670
Vivo X200s
2949
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
1791
Vivo X200s
9258
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)6702949
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)17919258
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
380330
Vivo X200s
2651991
CPU121229587082
GPU607331173209
Memory90588421617
UX107790470083
NanoReview Score3803302651991
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
1173
Vivo X200s
n/a
Stability99 %n/a
Graphics Test7 fpsn/a
Graphics Score1173n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Tecno Camon 19 Pro]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
9292
Vivo X200s
n/a
Writing score12566n/a
Web score7874n/a
Video editing5179n/a
Data manipulation6571n/a
NanoReview Score9292n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB - 12 GB
- 16 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency n/a 5333 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 128 GB
- 256 GB		- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.1UFS 4.1
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) Android 15
UI Skin HIOS 13 OriginOS 5

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 6200 mAh
Max Charging Power 33 W 90 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No Yes (40 W)
Reverse Charging No Yes
Fast Charging Yes (47% in 30 min) Yes (70% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 1:28 h 0:54 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
22:29
Vivo X200s
n/a
Web Browsing07:34 hn/a
Video Playback12:10 hn/a
Games05:08 hn/a
Standby Mode128 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 64 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 9000x7000 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 2x Optical, 3x
Flash Quad LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens n/a 119 °
Lenses count Standard: 64 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Depth: 2 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix64 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Focal length26 mm23 mm
SensorSamsung S5KGWBSony IMX921
Sensor size1/1.71/1.56
Pixel size0.8 μm1 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusLaser autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.6
Focal length50 mm70 mm
SensorSamsung S5KJN1Sony IMX882
Sensor size1/2.761/1.95
Pixel size0.64 μm0.7 μm
StabilizationDigitalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrixn/a50 MP
Aperturen/af/2.0
Focal lengthn/a15 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung JD1
Sensor sizen/a1/3.14
Pixel sizen/a0.7 μm
Stabilizationn/aDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution n/a 6528x4896 pixels
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 26 mm 20 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KGD2 Samsung KD1
Sensor size 1/3.4 1/3.44
Pixel size 0.8 μm n/a
Autofocus No n/a
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Varies by region Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66)
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers Mono n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos No n/a

Other

Class Mid-range Flagship
Announced June, 2022 yr April, 2025 yr
Release Date July, 2022 yr April, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 200 600
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes 90 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200s the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below