Tecno Camon 19 vs Tecno Spark Slim
45
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 19 Manufactured in July, 2022, with display 6.8 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Tecno Spark Slim, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 19
- Larger display: 6.8in
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Slim
- Higher pixel density: 440ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 156g vs 198g
- Higher battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 pixels | 1224x2720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6 % | 89.1 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.63 mm (6.56 in) | 164.2 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 74.37 mm (2.93 in) | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) | 5.93 mm (0.23 in) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 156 g (5.5 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- White - Black |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 422 | 718 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1403 | 1985 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1480 |
| CPU | 79884 | 220476 |
| GPU | 33230 | 48665 |
| Memory | 59280 | 149900 |
| UX | 65196 | 172511 |
| NanoReview Score | 237590 | 591552 |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 730 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9131 | n/a |
| Web score | 8121 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6356 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5340 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8368 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 13 | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes (52% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:33 h | 0:57 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9000x7000 pixels | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | n/a |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | June, 2022 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 185 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 190 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark Slim the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
