Tecno Camon 30 Pro vs Oppo A54
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 30 Pro Manufactured in March, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, vs Oppo A54, Manufactured in April, 2021 with chipsetMediatek Helio P35. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 30 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Oppo A54
- Lighter design: 192g vs 195g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.51 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 500 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8 % | 82.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164 mm (6.46 in) | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 74.5 mm (2.93 in) | 75.7 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Water resistance | n/a | IPX4 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | n/a | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Mediatek Helio P35 |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex A55) - 3/3 (Cortex A78) - 1/3.1 (Cortex A78) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 580 | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G610 MP6 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1442 GFLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1260 | 479 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4030 | 1522 |
| CPU | 241338 | 53877 |
| GPU | 239159 | 18570 |
| Memory | 208397 | 37818 |
| UX | 240189 | 37294 |
| NanoReview Score | 929083 | 147559 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | n/a | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | ColorOS 11.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 18 min) | Yes (30% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:44 h | 2:25 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 90 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3L6 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 14 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4624x3468 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/3.06 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | UMTS 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | March, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2024 yr | April, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 400 | 160 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 30 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0