Tecno Camon 30 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 30 Pro Manufactured in March, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, vs Xiaomi Poco C65, Manufactured in November, 2023with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 30 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C65
- Lighter design: 192g vs 195g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 600 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8 % | 83.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164 mm (6.46 in) | 168 mm (6.61 in) |
| Width | 74.5 mm (2.93 in) | 78 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) | 8.09 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Water resistance | n/a | No |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | n/a | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- Black - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex A55) - 3/3 (Cortex A78) - 1/3.1 (Cortex A78) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 580 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1442 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1260 | 416 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4030 | 1155 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1132 |
| CPU | 241338 | 77673 |
| GPU | 239159 | 41935 |
| Memory | 208397 | 68823 |
| UX | 240189 | 76829 |
| NanoReview Score | 929083 | 265260 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | n/a | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 18 min) | Yes (28% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:44 h | 2:09 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 08:24 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 13:39 h |
| Games | n/a | 04:35 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 153 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 28 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 14 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 400 | 90 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | Yes 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 30 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0