Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Honor 200 Lite
63
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G Manufactured in March, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate, vs Honor 200 Lite, Manufactured in May, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6080. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor 200 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 394ppi
- Lighter design: 166g vs 190g
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/256 GB | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 1080x2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20.1:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 600 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.4 mm (6.47 in) | 161.05 mm (6.34 in) |
| Width | 74.3 mm (2.93 in) | 74.55 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) | 6.78 mm (0.27 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 166 g (5.86 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | No |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1068 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 136.7 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 730 | 773 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1953 | 2076 |
| CPU | 130560 | 134439 |
| GPU | 71805 | 67436 |
| Memory | 111938 | 102921 |
| UX | 115288 | 108543 |
| NanoReview Score | 429591 | 413366 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 15 | MagicOS 8 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 23 min) | Yes (80% in 51 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:52 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 45 |
| Preview | n/a | 50 |
| Zoom | n/a | 64 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| LTE category | n/a | 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | April, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2025 yr | May, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 329 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
