Home Phone comparison Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G and Motorola Razr (2023) - Which is better?

Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G vs Motorola Razr (2023)

70 out 100
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
VS
58 out 100
Motorola Razr (2023)
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
Motorola Razr (2023)

Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G Manufactured in March, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300, vs Motorola Razr (2023), Manufactured in June, 2023 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
  • Lighter design: 179g vs 188.6g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 4200mAh
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Motorola Razr (2023)
  • Larger display: 6.9in
  • Higher pixel density: 413ppi
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB		 - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G and Motorola Razr (2023)
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
vs
Motorola Razr (2023)

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 in 6.9 in
Resolution 1080x2436 pixels 1080x2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 22:9
Pixel density 393 ppi 413 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) No
Max brightness n/a 500 nits
HDR support No Yes HDR10+
Screen-to-body ratio 90.6 % 85.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
n/a
Motorola Razr (2023)
1063 nits
sRGB gamutn/a98.6 %
PWM (Flicker)n/a180 Hz
Response timen/a1 ms
Contrastn/a∞ Infinite
Sources: NotebookCheck [Motorola Razr (2023)]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 164.3 mm (6.47 in) 170.82 mm (6.73 in)
Width 74.6 mm (2.94 in) 73.95 mm (2.91 in)
Thickness 7.3 mm (0.29 in) 7.35 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 179 g (6.31 oz) 188.6 g (6.65 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP52
Back panel n/a Plastic
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Green		 - Blue
- Green
- Purple
- Yellow
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
90.6 %
Motorola Razr (2023)
85.3 %

Performance

Testing Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G and Motorola Razr (2023) In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
Max Frequency 2500 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78)		 - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510)
- 3/2.36 (Cortex-A710)
- 1/2.4 (Cortex-A710)
Process TSMC Samsung
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 655 Hexagon
Graphics Mali-G615 MP2 Adreno 644
GPU Cores 256 768
GPU Frequency 1047 MHz 443 MHz
FLOPS 536.1 GFLOPS 1013.8 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
1034
Motorola Razr (2023)
1056
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
3257
Motorola Razr (2023)
3064
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)10341056
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)32573064
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
739074
Motorola Razr (2023)
672050
CPU220937229784
GPU148495171319
Memory202647134277
UX166995136670
NanoReview Score739074672050

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 8 GB
- 12 GB		 - 8 GB
- 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB- 128 GB
- 256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 13
OS Size n/a 16 GB
UI Skin HIOS 15 My UX

Battery

Volume 5200 mAh 4200 mAh
Max Charging Power 45 W 30 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No Yes (5 W)
Reverse Charging No No
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 23 min) Yes (57% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 1:01 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
n/a
Motorola Razr (2023)
18:44
Web Browsingn/a07:43 h
Video Playbackn/a12:27 h
Gamesn/a04:55 h
Standby Moden/a82 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 64 MP
Photo resolution n/a 9248x6936 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 120 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens n/a 120 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP		 Standard: 64 MP
Ultra-wide: 13 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP64 MP
Aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Focal length23 mm25 mm
SensorSony LYT-701OmniVision OV64B
Sensor size1/1.561/2
Pixel size1 μm0.7 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix8 MP13 MP
Aperturen/af/2.2
Focal lengthn/a16 mm
Sensorn/aHynix Hi1336
Sensor sizen/a1/3
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital
Main camera DxOMark results
Photo quality
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
146
Motorola Razr (2023)
n/a
Video quality
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
134
Motorola Razr (2023)
n/a
Overall camera score
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
138
Motorola Razr (2023)
n/a
Bokeh75n/a
Preview69n/a
Zoom110n/a
Sources: DxOMark [Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G]

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution n/a 6528x4896 pixels
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.4
Focal length 24 mm 25 mm
Sensor n/a OmniVision OV32B
Sensor size 1/2.8 1/3
Pixel size n/a 0.7 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
DisplayPort No n/a
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*21
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM Standbyn/a
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 1/2/4/5/8
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B18/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B39/B40/B41/B46/B48/B66/B71)
LTE categoryn/a18
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos n/a Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
n/a
Motorola Razr (2023)
77.3 dB

Other

Class Mid-range Flagship
Announced March, 2025 yr June, 2023 yr
Release Date March, 2025 yr June, 2023 yr
Launch Price ($) n/a 599
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 45 W Yes 33 W

Note

Motorola Razr (2023):

In all countries except the USA, the smartphone is called the Motorola Razr 40.

* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below