Tecno Camon 50 4G vs Vivo iQOO 15R
63
out 100
VS
88
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 50 4G Manufactured in March, 2026, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, vs Vivo iQOO 15R, Manufactured in March, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 4G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Lighter design: 172g vs 202g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO 15R
- Higher pixel density: 459ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7600mAh vs 6150mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.3
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | n/a | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.59 in |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 pixels | 1260x2750 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 459 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) | 157.61 mm (6.21 in) |
| Width | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) | 74.42 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Black - Silver |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
6/3.32 () |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 829 |
| GPU Cores | 64 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| FLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS | 2457.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 746 | 2698 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2020 | 8830 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 21113 |
| CPU | 131686 | 1018344 |
| GPU | 72057 | 997845 |
| Memory | 110256 | 433367 |
| UX | 119058 | 823006 |
| NanoReview Score | 433057 | 3272562 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 16 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 6150 mAh | 7600 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (44% in 30 min) | Yes (46% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:18 h | 1:04 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B71) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2026 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2026 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 495 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO 15R the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
