Tecno Camon 50 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
69
out 100
VS
58
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Camon 50 Pro 5G Manufactured in March, 2026, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, vs Tecno Spark 50 5G, Manufactured in April, 2026with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 Pro 5G
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 175g vs 210g
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 50 5G
- Higher pixel density: 2557ppi
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 pixels | 720x1576 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 2557 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3 % | 83.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) | 167.9 mm (6.61 in) |
| Width | 77 mm (3.03 in) | 79.3 mm (3.12 in) |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | n/a |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Black - Gold - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 |
| Max Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 655 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 256 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1065 | 810 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3199 | 2027 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 3057 | n/a |
| CPU | 274580 | 338325 |
| GPU | 237549 | 41973 |
| Memory | 154592 | 120193 |
| UX | 188163 | 241297 |
| NanoReview Score | 854884 | 741788 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 16 | HIOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 70 mm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 14 mm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2026 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2026 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 160 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 50 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
