Tecno Pop 9 4G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
50
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pop 9 4G Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T615, vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pop 9 4G
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 30 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1080x2436 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 21:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 1700 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 83.7 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.62 mm (6.52 in) | 166.6 mm (6.56 in) |
| Width | 77.01 mm (3.03 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.35 mm (0.33 in) | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP54 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Eco Leather |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- White - Black |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T615 | MediaTek Helio G100 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 108.8 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 440 | 733 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1432 | 2028 |
| CPU | 95156 | 129291 |
| GPU | 26471 | 70881 |
| Memory | 109093 | 105409 |
| UX | 70926 | 117287 |
| NanoReview Score | 301646 | 422868 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | Android Go | HIOS 14.5 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (49% in 40 min) | Yes (50% in 38 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:54 h | 1:12 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 108 MP Depth |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.52 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | n/a |
| Stabilization | No | n/a |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | September, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 80 | 220 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 15 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark 30 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
