Tecno Pova 2 vs Honor 400 Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 2 Manufactured in June, 2021, with display 6.9 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Honor 400 Lite, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 2
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5230mAh
Reasons to choose Honor 400 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 394ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 161g vs 207g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.9 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 pixels | 1080x2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.5:9 | 20.1:9 |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 480 nits | 3500 nits |
| HDR support | No | n/a |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 173.3 mm (6.82 in) | 161 mm (6.34 in) |
| Width | 78.8 mm (3.1 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm (0.38 in) | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 207 g (7.3 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | n/a |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 144 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 274 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 519 | 956 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1565 | 2303 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 143 |
| CPU | 85473 | 161440 |
| GPU | 39924 | 78966 |
| Memory | 64027 | 116384 |
| UX | 75795 | 140445 |
| NanoReview Score | 265219 | 497235 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 716 | n/a |
| Writing score | 8903 | n/a |
| Web score | 6915 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6103 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6304 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8217 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 7.6 | MagicOS 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 7000 mAh | 5230 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 90 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 3:30 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 48 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B48) | n/a |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | June, 2021 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2021 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 150 | 299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 Lite the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0