Home Phone comparison Tecno Pova 4 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) - Which is better?

Tecno Pova 4 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)

55 out 100
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
VS
89 out 100
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
Tecno Pova 4 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)

Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 4 Pro Manufactured in October, 2022, with display 6.66 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China), Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
    • Larger display: 6.82in
    • Higher pixel density: 510ppi
    • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
    • Lighter design: 210g vs 211g
    • Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 6000mAh
    • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
    • Infrared port

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB
    - 16/256 GB
    - 16/512 GB
    - 16/1024 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Tecno Pova 4 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    vs
    iQOO Neo 11 (China)

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED AMOLED
    Size 6.66 in 6.82 in
    Resolution 1080x2460 pixels 1440x3168 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 19.8:9
    Pixel density 403 ppi 510 ppi
    Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (1-120 Hz)
    Max brightness 450 nits n/a
    HDR support No Yes, HDR10+
    Screen-to-body ratio 84.4 % 90.2 %
    Features n/a - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 164.79 mm (6.49 in) 163.37 mm (6.43 in)
    Width 77 mm (3.03 in) 76.71 mm (3.02 in)
    Thickness 9.19 mm (0.36 in) 8.05 mm (0.32 in)
    Weight 211 g (7.44 oz) 210 g (7.41 oz)
    Water resistance No IP69
    Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
    Back panel Plastic n/a
    Frame Plastic Metal
    Colors - Gray
    - Blue
    - Red    		 - White
    - Black
    - Blue
    - Orange
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes, In-Display
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    84.4 %
    Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
    90.2 %

    Performance

    Testing Tecno Pova 4 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
    Max Frequency 2200 MHz 4320 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
    Architecture - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
    - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)    		 - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M))
    - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L))
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 6 nm 3 nm
    Neural Processor Yes Hexagon
    Graphics Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 830
    GPU Cores 128 1536
    GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1100 MHz
    FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 3379.2 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    731
    Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
    2956
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    1889
    Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
    9332
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)7312956
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)18899332
    Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a19337
    Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)]
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    403684
    Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
    3263669
    CPU128793930247
    GPU573761185615
    Memory108333469501
    UX109182678306
    NanoReview Score4036843263669
    3DMark Wild Life
    3DMark Wild Life
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    1254
    Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
    n/a
    Stability99 %n/a
    Graphics Test7 fpsn/a
    Graphics Score1254n/a
    Sources: 3DMark [Tecno Pova 4 Pro]
    PCMark 3.0
    PCMark 3.0
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    10284
    Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China)
    n/a
    Writing score13149n/a
    Web score8030n/a
    Video editing6274n/a
    Data manipulation6839n/a
    NanoReview Score10284n/a

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size 8 GB 12 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
    Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 5300 MHz
    Channels 2 4
    Storage
    Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1
    Memory CardMicroSDNo

    Software

    OS Android 12 Android 16
    UI Skin HiOS 8.6 OriginOS 6

    Battery

    Volume 6000 mAh 7500 mAh
    Max Charging Power 45 W 100 W
    Battery Type Li-ion Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging Yes Yes
    Fast Charging Yes (50% in 24 min) Yes

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 8190x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
    Zoom Digital Digital
    Flash Dual LED Dual LED
    Stabilization Digital Optical
    8K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
    4K Recording No Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    Slow Motion n/a 240 fps (1080p)
    Wide-angle lens n/a 119 °
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Depth: 2 MP    		 Standard: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 8 MP
    Features Bokeh effect - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    - RAW support
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/1.8f/1.9
    Focal lengthn/a23 mm
    Sensorn/aSony LYT-700C
    Sensor sizen/a1/1.56
    Pixel sizen/a1 μm
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationDigitalOptical
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrixn/a8 MP
    Aperturen/af/2.2
    Stabilizationn/aDigital

    Front camera

    Matrix 8 MP 16 MP
    Photo resolution 3264x2448 pixels n/a
    Aperture f/2.4 f/2.5
    Sensor n/a Sony IMX480
    Sensor size n/a 1/3.09
    Pixel size n/a 1 μm
    Autofocus No No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display    		 - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5 5.4
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode    		 - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort n/a No
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS    		 - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    NFC* Yes Yes
    Infrared Port No Yes
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800MHz
    3G Bandsn/aWCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
    LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B66)
    LTE category13n/a
    5G SupportNoYes

    Sound

    Speakers Stereo n/a
    3.5 mm Jack Yes No
    FM Radio Yes No
    Dolby Atmos No n/a

    Other

    Class Mid-range Flagship
    Announced October, 2022 yr October, 2025 yr
    Release Date October, 2022 yr October, 2025 yr
    Launch Price ($) 265 n/a
    MSRP ($) n/a 370
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor    		 - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 45 W Yes, 100 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (China) the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    1 (100%)
    Total Votes: 1

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below