Tecno Pova 4 vs Tecno Spark Slim
52
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 4 Manufactured in October, 2022, with display 6.82 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99, vs Tecno Spark Slim, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 4
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5160mAh
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Slim
- Higher pixel density: 440ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 156g vs 213g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/128 GB | n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.82 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1224x2720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 257 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 89.1 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 170.6 mm (6.72 in) | 164.2 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 77.5 mm (3.05 in) | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm (0.34 in) | 5.93 mm (0.23 in) |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 156 g (5.5 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue |
- White - Black |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 710 | 718 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1640 | 1985 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1480 |
| CPU | 124887 | 220476 |
| GPU | 64726 | 48665 |
| Memory | 106488 | 149900 |
| UX | 101970 | 172511 |
| NanoReview Score | 398071 | 591552 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1249 | n/a |
| Writing score | 13215 | n/a |
| Web score | 8080 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6368 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6678 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 10249 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HiOS 12 | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 60 min) | Yes (52% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:57 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8190x6144 pixels | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2022 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 180 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 190 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark Slim the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
