Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Infinix Hot 30i
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 6 Pro Manufactured in March, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6080, vs Infinix Hot 30i, Manufactured in March, 2023with chipsetUnisoc T606. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Infinix Hot 30i
- Lighter design: 191g vs 198.3g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.56 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1612 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.1 % | 83.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 138.6 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 90 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.5 mm (6.52 in) | 164 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 in) | 75.75 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.99 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
- White - Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Unisoc T606 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1068 MHz | 650 MHz |
| FLOPS | 136.7 GFLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 770 | 376 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2096 | 1315 |
| CPU | 135338 | 80363 |
| GPU | 69698 | 23190 |
| Memory | 109252 | 79761 |
| UX | 122926 | 62883 |
| NanoReview Score | 437214 | 246197 |
| Writing score | n/a | 8425 |
| Web score | n/a | 7583 |
| Video editing | n/a | 4249 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 5297 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 7029 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 4 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| OS Size | 56 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | XOS 10.6 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | n/a |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 80 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:00 h | 2:40 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:48 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 16:03 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:34 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 155 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM B2|3|5|8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1234578202828B3841) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | March, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2024 yr | March, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 229 | 110 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova 6 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0