Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 6 Pro Manufactured in March, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6080, vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C, Manufactured in November, 2023with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 13C
- Lighter design: 192g vs 198.3g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.1 % | 83.7 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 138.6 % | 94.5 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 90 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | 37 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 1536:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.5 mm (6.52 in) | 168 mm (6.61 in) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 in) | 78 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 8.09 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.99 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
- White - Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 1068 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 136.7 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 770 | 434 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2096 | 1198 |
| CPU | 135338 | 73306 |
| GPU | 69698 | 41918 |
| Memory | 109252 | 73668 |
| UX | 122926 | 80114 |
| NanoReview Score | 437214 | 269006 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 16) |
| OS Size | 56 GB | 23 GB |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (28% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:00 h | 2:09 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:48 h | 09:31 h |
| Video Playback | 16:03 h | 15:08 h |
| Games | 05:34 h | 04:55 h |
| Standby Mode | 155 h | 143 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 28 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 229 | 140 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova 6 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1