Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi A3
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 6 Pro Manufactured in March, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6080, vs Xiaomi Redmi A3, Manufactured in February, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G36. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 198.3g vs 199g
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A3
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.71 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1650 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 268 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 420 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.1 % | 84.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 138.6 % | 95.1 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 90 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | 40 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 1314:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.5 mm (6.52 in) | 168.3 mm (6.63 in) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 in) | 76.3 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 8.32 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 198.3 g (6.99 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | MediaTek Helio G36 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1068 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 136.7 GFLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 770 | 230 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2096 | 840 |
| CPU | 135338 | 55340 |
| GPU | 69698 | 10749 |
| Memory | 109252 | 42864 |
| UX | 122926 | 45030 |
| NanoReview Score | 437214 | 153983 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| OS Size | 56 GB | 19 GB |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | MIUI Go Edition |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:00 h | 2:40 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:48 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 16:03 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:34 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 155 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 8 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 2592x1944 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM B2, B3, B5, B8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1, B5, B8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28) |
| LTE category | n/a | 4 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | February, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2024 yr | February, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 229 | 80 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | Yes 10 W |
Note
Xiaomi Redmi A3:
The smartphone in green color is 7 grams lighter than the others.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova 6 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0