Tecno Pova 6 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 6 Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max, Manufactured in August, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 6
- Lighter design: 195g vs 229.5g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 447ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 6000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.2
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 pixels | 1280x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 1060 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1 % | 89.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.2 mm (6.54 in) | 163.4 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) | 78.3 mm (3.08 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 229.5 g (8.1 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IP68 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green |
- Black - Blue - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 128 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 726 | 1099 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1983 | 3481 |
| CPU | 131913 | 348694 |
| GPU | 71029 | 119297 |
| Memory | 106630 | 267736 |
| UX | 119322 | 271413 |
| NanoReview Score | 428894 | 1007140 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | n/a |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (57% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:00 h | 1:01 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 20:44 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 33:14 h |
| Games | n/a | 09:29 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 223 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8160x6120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | No |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.61 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| LTE category | 13 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | April, 2024 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2024 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 145 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | Yes, 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0