Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G vs Infinix Hot 60 5G
73
out 100
VS
56
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G Manufactured in July, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, vs Infinix Hot 60 5G, Manufactured in July, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5200mAh
Reasons to choose Infinix Hot 60 5G
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Lighter design: 193g vs 201g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2 % | 85 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 160 mm (6.3 in) | 166 mm (6.54 in) |
| Width | 75.2 mm (2.96 in) | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Blue - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1240 | 914 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4352 | 2259 |
| CPU | 307585 | 153352 |
| GPU | 544069 | 80936 |
| Memory | 252604 | 117865 |
| UX | 272545 | 125299 |
| NanoReview Score | 1376803 | 477452 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | n/a | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | n/a | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 15 | XOS 15.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 18 min) | Yes (37% in 34 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:55 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (1080p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 60 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 60 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/1.6 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | n/a | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM (850/900/1800/1900) |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA (850/900/1900/2100) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | June, 2025 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2025 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 130 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | Yes, 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
