Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
73
out 100
VS
58
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G Manufactured in July, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 201g vs 209g
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z11 Lite
- Larger display: 6.74in
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 6000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2 % | 85 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 160 mm (6.3 in) | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) |
| Width | 75.2 mm (2.96 in) | 77.1 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 8.39 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 768 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1240 | 737 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4352 | 1803 |
| CPU | 307585 | 220038 |
| GPU | 544069 | 44183 |
| Memory | 252604 | 97047 |
| UX | 272545 | 147903 |
| NanoReview Score | 1376803 | 509171 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | n/a | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | n/a | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 15 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 44 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | n/a |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 18 min) | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/1.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | n/a | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PAN, OPP, LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | n/a | 2G 850/900/1800 МГц |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B28/B66/B71) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June, 2025 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2025 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 390 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | Yes, 44 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
