Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G Manufactured in July, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 7 Ultra 5G
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Lighter design: 201g vs 219g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher battery capacity: 7410mAh vs 6000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1280x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max brightness | n/a | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2 % | 90 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 160 mm (6.3 in) | 163.4 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 75.2 mm (2.96 in) | 77.9 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- White - Gray - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 3630 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1240 | 2676 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4352 | 8922 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 23887 |
| CPU | 307585 | 612803 |
| GPU | 544069 | 1209263 |
| Memory | 252604 | 643114 |
| UX | 272545 | 516680 |
| NanoReview Score | 1376803 | 2981860 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | n/a | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | n/a | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 15 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 7410 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 18 min) | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.55 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV08F |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV20B |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.0 |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | n/a | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | n/a |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | June, 2025 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2025 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 900 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | Yes 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0